911-archiv.net

John Key talks about 9/11 explosive devices

Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building



Bush says this, "For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."

It sounds eerily like what happened at the WTC on 9/11. Was he referring that the "terrorists" planted explosives in the towers or that foiled plots had planned to use that tactic? Or was he referring to the WTC?


Video of press conference:

www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.v.html

Transcript of press conference:
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html

"In the course of the discussion, Cheney used the exact words “blew up the World
Trade Center ” in reference to the al Qaeda network which, according to the
official version, masterminded the 9-11 operation but absolutely did not “blow
up” the World Trade Center since that implies implanted explosives and an
inside job of some kind.

“Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is the man who killed 3,000 Americans on 9-11, blew up
the World Trade Center , attacked the Pentagon, tried to blow up the White
House and the Capitol Building . . . an evil man,” said Cheney to Schieffer,
who did not react to the words “blew up.” "

www.mail-archive.com/ This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it /msg00504.htm

David Cameron 9/11 ''Twin Towers blown up"



2010 — This morning on BBC news as David Cameron gave a speech to the troops in Afghanistan he said "In/on 9-11 when the twin towers were Blown up'' ...
Not long after this the feed was cut and as far as i saw it was never repeated, It is on BBC website but that part is not there (as far as I've seen)...
Kategorie:

Also von dieser Deutung halten er hier und auch ich nichts.

Deswegen auch das Fragezeichen nach Freudian Slip of the tongue. Es ist eben Ansichtssache. Interessant wäre es aber, wenn die Behauptung zutreffen würde, dass dieser Teil der Rede nicht mehr auf der BBC website zu finden wäre...