Erstmals stimmt so nicht, es ist wohl die größte Veröffentlichung, es gab aber 2008 schon mal eine "Vorabversion" auf Grund einer FOIA-Anfrage. Allein der Umstand, dass Material zum Kriminalfall des Jahrhunderts überhaupt erst herausgepresst werden muss ist schon bizarr.
Hier die Analyse der Daten damals:
www.historycommons.org/news.jsp?oid=140393703-423
www.rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents...Commission_0228.html
John Doe II, es ist dein Spezialgebiet, gib du den Takt vor, auf welchen Punkt wir uns fokussieren sollten. Welcher die klarsten Lügen im FBI-File belegt.
September 11, 2001: Weapons Found on Additional Planes Indicate Possible inside Help for Hijackers
Later in the day of 9/11, weapons are found planted on board three US airplanes. A US official will say, “These look like inside jobs.” Time magazine will later report, “Sources tell Time that US officials are investigating whether the hijackers had accomplices deep inside the airports’ ‘secure’ areas.” [TIME, 9/22/2001] Penetrating airport security does not appear to have been that difficult: Argenbright, the company in charge of security at all the airports used by the hijackers, had virtually no security check on any of its employees, and even hired criminals and illegal immigrants. Security appears to be particularly abysmal at Boston’s Logan Airport, even after 9/11. [BOSTON GLOBE, 10/1/2001; CNN, 10/12/2001] An FAA official had similar concerns about two other security contractors at Logan Airport: Huntleigh USA, a subsidiary of ICTS International NV, a large Israeli security company, and Globe Aviation. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/11/2001; CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, 1/8/2002; 9/11 COMMISSION, 3/11/2004, PP. 6 ]
www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=...091101plantedweapons