Der Artikel von Kevin Ryan ist sehr interessant, da er einige interessante Hintergründe und Verbindungen der am Pentagonrenovierungsprogramm beleuchtet
digwithin.net/2012/06/15/from-renovation...ttacked-from-within/
Ryan geht von Bomben aus, die zum Zeitpunkt des Flugzeugeinschlags gezündet worden seien und spricht offen von einer Vertuschung bei der Untersuchung des Pentagonschadens:
In addition to the use of new aviation technology and guidance systems, there is reason to believe that explosives were planted in the building. This evidence includes witness testimony to a strong shockwave indicative of an explosion. Other witnesses with military experience testified to the strong smell of cordite, a low-grade military explosive, at the scene.[79]
All things considered, the evidence suggests that Mlakar and his Pentagon building assessment was intended to be a cover-up. Furthermore, if the attack on the Pentagon had anything to do with explosives, remote targeting of objects ht near the ground, or airfields, Mlakar’s experience at JAYCOR and ERDC would have helped him to know what evidence to avoid.
Tja Moses, Ryan hält Bomben nicht für "möglich", sodnern für erwiesen. Er ist doch nun wie ich ein Verleumder, oder? Und wenn nicht, warum?